<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Explorer &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalexplorer.com/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalexplorer.com</link>
	<description>Bringing the world to the classroom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:11:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Social networking &#8211; contacts or content?</title>
		<link>http://digitalexplorer.com/2009/05/03/social-networking-contacts-or-content/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalexplorer.com/2009/05/03/social-networking-contacts-or-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digital Explorer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalexplorer.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise and rise of Twitter (a micro-blogging tool) has brought into sharp focus a division or shift in the social networking or web 2.0 landscape. If web 2.0 can be categorised as online conversation, whether that be through the written word, images, video or a mix of the three, do we join these conversations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise and rise of Twitter (a micro-blogging tool) has brought into sharp focus a division or shift in the social networking or web 2.0 landscape.</p>
<p>If web 2.0 can be categorised as online conversation, whether that be through the written word, images, video or a mix of the three, do we join these conversations based on who they&#8217;re with or what they&#8217;re about?</p>
<p>Contacts or content?</p>
<p>The difference is most notable when comparing a service such as Facebook and something like Twitter. Facebook replicates real world friendship and contact groups, whether professional or personal. Although some people gather &#8216;friends&#8217; as those they&#8217;re life depended on it, the convention seems to be that I need to know you before I allow you to be my &#8216;friend&#8217;.</p>
<p>Conversely with Twitter, the friendship aspect is taken away. I can become a &#8216;follower&#8217; of someone&#8217;s Twitter feed (the list of short comments or &#8216;tweets&#8217; that are made and posted online). Becoming a follower of their feed does not make me their friend. It means that what they are saying is interesting and I would like to know what they have to say. It may be that I know this person in the real world and know that they are interesting, but there is much more opportunity to take the &#8216;contact&#8217; aspect out of Twitter and keep your relations based on your interest in the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalexplorer.com/2009/05/03/social-networking-contacts-or-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

